|
Subject:
growth-hormone-releasing
substances
Submitted By:
Chris
Klingeisen,
Bronx,
NY
|
QUESTION:
In your
book you talk about exogenous hormones, and how detrimental they can be to the
body's natural hormone production. My questions are:
1) Would
supplementing with Mucuna (standardized to 15% L-Dopa) before sleep result in
down-regulation of natural GH? Since L-Dopa is supposed to stimulate the release
of hypothalmic GHRH, I would think that it'd be far enough up on the axis that
negative side effects would be either reduced or non-existent. The fact that the
Mucuna itself is not a hormone would also lead me to think that the law of
exogenous hormones would not apply. I definitely don't want to hurt my natural
GH production, and I'd only be using the Mucuna in pre-contest type situations
to get extra 'cut.' Would this strategy back-fire on me?
2) What
about glutamine? It's been shown to increase GH levels, but does it drive down
natural GH production? Should glutamine be avoided?!?
|
ROB'S ANSWER:
1)
You
are
correct
that
the
feedback
problem
is
muted
"the
higher
up
the
axis"
you
go
because
the
body
has
more
regulatory
control.
However,
for
the
same
reason,
the
efficacy
is
typically
muted
the
higher
up
the
axis
you
go.
2)
I
feel
confident
in
saying
that
glutamine
will
not
drive
down
natural
GH
production.
At
the
same
time,
it
may
not
drive
it
up.
The
evidence
that
glutamine
stimulates
GH
release
is
not
nearly
as
convincing
as
many
supplement
manufacturers
would
have
you
believe.
Having
said
that,
there
is
impressive
evidence
showing
that
glutamine
supplementation
may
convey
other
benefits
i.e.,
anti-catabolic
and
immune-supportive.
The
biggest
problem
with
this
nutrient
is
that
it
is
so
painfully
expensive.
         Return
to
Index         
Subject:
fats
Submitted By:
Phillip
Smith,
New
York,
NY
|
QUESTION: The
whole
topic
of
fats
confuses
me.
I
always
thought
that
"essential
fatty
acids"
referred
to
omega
3
and
omega
6,
but
I
read
recently
there
is
also
omega
9
essential
fatty
acids?!
Also,
what
does
"saturated,
"monounsaturated,"
and
"polyunsaturated,"
actually
mean
and
what's
the
relationship
between
these
terms
and
the
omega
distinctions?
I'm
really
trying
to
understand
this
stuff,
but
it
makes
my
head
spin.
Any
help
would
be
appreciated.
|
ROB'S
ANSWER:
First,
let
me
clarify
that
omega
9
is
not
an
EFA
(essential
fatty
acid);
nor
is
omega
7,
for
that
matter.
Only
omega
3
and
omega
6
fatty
acids
are
essential.
Contrary
to
popular
belief,
"omega"
does
not
denote
essentiality.
Rather
it
is
a
numbering
system
that
biochemists
use
to
identify
carbon
atoms
in
a
fatty
acid.
In
a
saturated
fatty
acid,
all
carbon
atoms
are
bound
to
a
maximum
number
of
hydrogen
atoms.
In
a
monounsaturated
fatty
acid,
hydrogen
atoms
are
missing
and
carbons
are
"double
bonded"
to
each
other
at
one
(i.e.,
"mono")
place
on
the
fatty
chain.
If
the
location
of
the
double
bond
is
7
carbon
atoms
from
the
"methyl
group"
(which
refers
to
one
end
of
the
fatty
acid,
situated
opposite
to
the
"carboxyl
group"),
then
it
is
called
"omega
7"
(or
palmitoleic
acid);
if
the
double
bond
occurs
at
carbon
9
then
it
is
called
"omega
9"
(or
oleic
acid).
As
you
may
have
guessed,
a
polyunsaturated
fatty
has
more
than
one
(i.e.,
"poly")
double-bond.
The
more
double-bonds
a
fatty
acid
has,
the
less
"saturated"
it
is
because
the
carbons
are
bonding
to
each
other
rather
than
to
hydrogen
atoms.
Omega
3
(alpha-linolenic
acid)
is
"less
saturated"
than
omega
6
(linoleic
acid);
but
the
relevant
difference
in
terms
of
the
omega
designation
is
that
the
first
double-bond
occurs
at
different
locations:
the
3rd
carbon
atom
and
the
6th
carbon
atom,
respectively.
The
amount
and
location
of
the
double
bonds
dictate
the
physical
and
chemical
properties
as
well
as
the
biological
functions
of
fatty
acids.
         Return
to
Index         
Subject:
artificial
sweeteners
Submitted By:
Hal
Bush,
Fort
Worth,
TX
|
QUESTION:
I
heard
that
artificial
sweeteners
like
aspartame,
saccharin,
etc.
can
raise
insulin
even
though
they
don't
contain
carbohydrates
and
don't
raise
blood
sugar
levels.
Is
this
true?
|
ROB'S ANSWER:
Sensory
factors
(sight,
taste,
smell,
etc.)
in
food
selection
is
widely
accepted.
However,
the
effects
of
sensory
stimulation
on
physiologic
processes,
such
as
insulin
release,
is
less
well
understood.
Specifically,
the
issue
of
whether
artificial
sweeteners,
via
what
is
termed
a
preabsorptive
or
cephalic
phase
response,
stimulate
insulin
release
is
controversial.
Based
on
the
studies
I've
reviewed,
here's
what
we
know:
1)
Cephalic
phase
physiological
responses
are
relatively
small
as
compared
with
the
physiological
response
elicited
when
food
is
metabolized.
(Therefore,
if
an
artificial
sweetener
causes
insulin
secretion
it
does
so
to
a
lesser
extent
than
sugar.)
2)
The
cephalic
phase
response
is
less
prominent
in
humans
than
in
animals.
3) Given
the
inconsistent
results
obtained
by
experiments
designed
to
demonstrate
a
cephalic
phase
insulin
response
in
humans,
significant
inter-individual
variation
can
be
inferred.
In
light
of
the
foregoing,
artificial
sweeteners
are
preferable
to
sugar
in
terms
of
insulin
release.
The
fact
that
they
have
fewer
or
zero
calories
and
that
they
do
not
add
to
liver
glycogen
stores
represent
further
fat
loss
advantages
over
sugar.
However,
whether
a
given
artificial
sweetener
is
safe
to
consume
is
another
matter,
which
needs
to
be
carefully
considered.
         Return
to
Index         
Subject:
diabetes
and
the
NHE
Eating
Plan
Submitted By:
Name
changed
by
Extique
due
to
personal
content
|
QUESTION: I
have
Type
I
diabetes.
Will
the
NHE
plan
work
with
"artificial"
insulin?
|
ROB'S ANSWER:
The
NHE
Eating
Plan
is
intended
for
healthy
individuals.
You
have
a
serious
medical
condition.
I
wish
you
the
best
of
health
and
happiness
-
and
I
regret
that
the
dietary
aspect
of
the
NHE
program
cannot
be
suitably
applied
to
help
you
achieve
these
ends.
         Return
to
Index         
Subject:
1)
coffee
relative
to
carb
limits
2)
the
post-workout
meal
Submitted By:
George
Plonka,
Director
Crowsnest
Pass
Weight
Club,
Blairmore,
Alberta,
Canada
|
QUESTION:
1)
I
start
each
day
with
a
couple
of
cups
of
coffee.
I
understand
that
this
may
increase
my
blood
sugar
levels.
In
view
of
this,
does
coffee
alter
my
carbohydrate
limits
during
the
"metabolic
shift"?
2)
My
pre-
and
post-workout
meals
are
in
the
form
of
shakes,
and
the
available
whey
protein
supplements
contain
small
amounts
of
carbohydrate
per
serving
(
6
to
8
).
Would
this
detract
from
the
effectiveness
of
the
meals
as
fat
burners
in
a
hormonal
sense?
|
ROB'S
REPLY:
Regarding
your
first
question,
did
you
read
the
information
on
Ask
Rob
concerning
coffee
in
relation
to
fat
burning?
READER'S
REPLY:
Thanks,
I
missed
it
initially,
but
now
found
it
and
read
it.
ROB'S
ANSWER:
1)
Having
read
the
information
concerning
coffee/fat-burning
on
Ask
Rob,
you
see
that
while
it
sheds
light
on
the
subject
it
doesn't
directly
answer
your
question
-
so
I
will
do
so
now.
No,
coffee
does
not
alter
the
carbohydrate
limits
during
the
metabolic
shift
or
at
any
other
time.
You
are
correct
that
coffee
ingestion
may
prompt
a
transient
increase
in
blood
sugar
level.
However,
it
does
not
ADD
sugar
to
your
system
nor
does
it
add
calories
(provided
you
drink
it
black,
of
course).
These
facts,
along
with
the
information
you
read
on
Ask
Rob
regarding
coffee/fat-burning,
render
coffee
a
non-factor
in
terms
of
carb
limits.
|
2)
The
answer
to
this
question
is
also
no.
As
an
initial
matter,
recall
from
NHE
that
carbohydrate
is
not
the
only
macronutrient
that
stimulates
insulin
release.
The
incremental
difference
in
insulin
release
associated
with
such
a
small
amount
of
carbohydrate
is
insignificant,
especially
in
light
of
your
obligation
to
account
for
the
carb
grams
and
thus
reduce
carbohydrate
intake
at
your
next
meal
or
"average
down"
throughout
the
rest
of
the
day.
In
other
words,
as
a
general
proposition,
as
long
as
one
adheres
to
daily
carb
limits
and
the
per-meal
limit,
total
daily
fat
burning
will
be
roughly
the
same
regardless
of
how
the
daily
carb
allotment
is
distributed.
|
|
.
.
.
as
long
as
one
adheres
to
daily
carb
limits
and
the
per-meal
limit,
total
daily
fat
burning
will
be
roughly
the
same
regardless
of
how
the
daily
carb
allotment
is
distributed.
|
|
|
|
more
about
coffee
(2-1)
more
about
coffee
(2-2)
         Return
to
Index         
READ
MORE
|